There goes the prevailing view of suspected/not yet convicted terrorists, as "poor, downtrodden, ill-educated" louts. What have we here? Doctors "gone wild" or "terroristic?" I have been following with a sense of astonishment, the parade of doctors being hunted down in the London/Glasgow attempted airport bombings. I am convinced that the doctors who were rounded up, since English is not their native tongue, got confused and thought "load car with explosives" meant "load patient with suppositories; "bomb airport," meant  "comb patient's port;" "do no harm," meant "yes, harm!" I don't even have a hemorrhoid problem, but I notice that I zeroed in on this theme. Calling Dr. Freud! What gives with my subconcious use of this theme? Is it because I think that the various excuses for tiptoeing around the real problem and perpetrators, have to do with a lot of waste material?

Anyway, I am hoping against hope, that this is all a big mistake, and we are going to find out that these doctors were moonlighting in what they thought was a "new" medical experiment in getting folks through airports in a more expeditious manner! I think that I may have stumbled onto a defense strategy. Lawyers for the doctors/defendents, call me. I have more ideas where that came from. Just give me a minute to ingest my "medication." 

Thank God the doctors who obey the Hippocratic Oath outnumber those who apparently are choosing not to.